Erratum: Comparison of Curosurf(R) versus Surfacten(R) in the Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Search: Neonatal Med Search

CLOSE

Neonatal Med > Volume 20(4); 2013 > Article

Published Erratum

Neonatal Medicine 2013;20(4):480-480.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5385/nm.2013.20.4.480 Published online January 15, 2014.

Erratum: Comparison of Curosurf(R) versus Surfacten(R) in the Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Jeong Nam Kim, Eun Jung Shim

Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Anyang, Korea.

Abstract

We have corrected the conclusion in abstract.

TOOLS

PDF Links
Full text via DOI
Download Citation

Share :

METRICS

0 Crossref
4,764 View
17 Download

Related articles in NM

Comparison of Respiratory Outcomes between Less Invasive Surfactant Administration and the Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation Technique in Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome2020 August;27(3)

Early Postnatal Dexamethasone Treatment in Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome(RDS)1994 November;1(2)

Comparison of Curosurf(R) versus Surfacten(R) in the Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome.2013 May;20(2)

Hemodynamic Changes Following Surfactant Therapy in Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome.1997 June;4(1)

Comparison of Synthetic Surfactant with Modified Bovine Surfactant in Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome.1999 November;6(2)

Editorial Office: 34, Sajik-ro 8–gil(King’s Gargen 3 Block 1207), Jongno-gu, Seoul 03174, Republic of Korea
Tel: +82-2-730-1993 Fax: +82-2-730-1994 E-mail: neonate2002@naver.com

Copyright © 2024 by The Korean Society of Neonatology.

prev

next